|
|
|
|
|
|
ENGLISH /
DEUTSCHE
/
FRENCH
/
RUSSIAN
/
ZİYARETÇİ
DEFTERİ |
|
|
|
|
|
Relentless wildfires roared
through Southern California for a third day Tuesday, sending
more than half a million residents fleeing with family members,
pets and whatever prize possessions they could fit in their
vehicles.

The blazes have charred 400,000 acres and reduced
1,300 homes -- 1,000 in San Diego County -- to ash. The fires
have killed one person and injured more than 50. Earlier
Tuesday, officials erroneously reported that a second person had
died.
Earlier Tuesday, Lt. Gov. John Garamendi, said
the number of evacuees "could very well approach 500,000 by the
end of the day."
By Tuesday night, officials had evacuated nearly
350,000 homes in San Diego County. Using U.S. Census Bureau
numbers from the 2000 census, that could mean as many as 950,000
were affected by the fires.
In San Diego County, at least 513,000 residents
had been ordered to find refuge in shelters, schools and
stadiums as fires pushed into new areas.
Twelve thousand more people were advised but not
ordered to evacuate.
President Bush will visit the area Thursday, the
White House said. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff
arrived in San Diego on Tuesday afternoon.
Chertoff promised a different federal reaction
from the one in New Orleans in 2005.
"We have been preparing and planning and training
together for the last 2½ years," he said.
And the scene at Qualcomm Stadium on Tuesday did
seem to live up to Chertoff's expectations as volunteers
cheerily handed out chairs, food and water.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency delivered
25,000 cots early Tuesday. Free newspapers were
available, National Guard troops kept watch, ventriloquists and
balloon artists entertained kids, and even massage therapists
were trying to help the 12,000 to 15,000 evacuees relax as they
fretted about the fate of their homes.
Meanwhile, at least two fires raged on the
property of the U.S. Marines' Camp Pendleton, north of San
Diego. Three-thousand Marines were evacuated Tuesday evening.
Paul McHale, assistant secretary of defense for
homeland defense, said 550 Camp Pendleton Marines were preparing
to deploy to the fire area.
As the Santa Ana winds, which approached 70 mph,
fueled the fires, 1,400 Navy personnel and their families were
evacuated, the Pentagon said.
And in an effort to make room for more civilians
who have had to evacuate their homes, sailors stationed in
Southern California are abandoning their barracks.
McHale said that a dozen Defense Department
firefighting teams, with 12 engines, were already working the
blazes, and more than 17,000 National Guardsmen are potentially
available if needed.
The Pentagon has provided 11 helicopters equipped
with water buckets to fight the fires, he said. But aerial
attacks on the fires have been minimal because of the fierce
Santa Ana winds.
California Gov.
Arnold Schwarzenegger has already called up 1,500 National Guard
troops, including more than 200 taken from border duty to help
with supplies and security at Qualcomm Stadium and DelMar
Fairgrounds and Racetrack, where thousands of evacuated
residents are taking shelter.
Eighteen firefighters have been injured in the
blazes, according to Schwarzenegger, who said Tuesday that he
was "heartbroken" after touring the Lake Arrowhead area where
the Grass Valley and Slide fires have burned 5,000 acres and
destroyed more than 200 homes.
Lake Arrowhead resident Michelle Dresser, who
owns a business and was chased from her home by a wildfire last
year, said Tuesday she was waiting until the last minute to
leave. She spent the night in her store, partly to help
customers and neighbors. "It is crazy. We are surrounded by fire
on both sides," she said.
Asked by CNN where she would go, she replied, "I
have to find someplace to accept two dogs, two cats and a
turtle."
Qualcomm Stadium is accepting animals.
New evacuation orders are being added frequently
to the San Diego Office of Emergency Services Web site.
Officials said the crisis is far from over.
"It will not end ... until it reaches the ocean
or the winds turn around," San Diego Fire Battalion Chief Bruce
Cartelli said Tuesday.
Despite having 21 years of experience as a
firefighter, Arthur Jackson marveled at the fires he battled.
"It is just amazing how this fire selects whatever it wants and
burns whatever it wants," he told CNN.
Although they were
toiling in 24-hour shifts, Jackson said he and his fellow
firefighters were "holding up pretty good." What weighed
heaviest on them was not so much the physical exertion, he said,
but knowing they had failed to protect all of the structures.
For some, the failure was more than a
professional concern. "Some of the firefighters -- their own
homes have burned up," he said.
|

Iran to release British sailors
IRAN has finally
announced it will free the captured British sailors and marines
as a gift to Britain.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today said he has pardoned
the 15 Brits detained in the Gulf last month.
He
said the move was a gift to the British people to mark the
birthday of Islam’s Prophet Muhammed and Easter.
The
announcement came minutes after he gave medals of honour to the
Iranian coast guards who intercepted the sailors and marines. He
told them: "On behalf of the great Iranian people, I want to
thank the Iranian Coast Guard who courageously defended and
captured those who violated their territorial waters."
He
also criticized Britain for deploying Leading Seaman Faye
Turney, one of the 15 detainees, because she is a woman with a
child.
He
said: "How can you justify seeing a mother away from her home,
her children? Why don’t they respect family values in the West?" A
Downing Street spokeswoman said: "We welcome what the President
has said about the release of our 15 personnel.
"We
are now establishing exactly what this means in terms of the
method and timing of their release."
Iranian media reported that the 15 captives "shouted with joy"
after hearing they were to be released.
They were taken to the British Embassy in Tehran after meeting
President Ahmadinejad at a special ceremony as part of the
release process.
The
freed Brits are expected to be flown back to the UK tomorrow. |
|
EU calls for
'democratic' Serbia
The European Union's foreign policy chief has said he stills
hopes for a "pro-European and democratic government" in
Serbia after the success of the ultra-nationalist Radical party
in elections on Sunday.
Javier Solana said he hoped "very much there will be a speedy
formation of a government that will be on the line of
pro-European forces". "The majority voted for forces that are
democratic and pro-European," Solana said as he arrived for a
meeting of EU foreign ministers to discuss the 27-member bloc's
strategy towards Belgrade in the light of the vote. The hardline
Radical party attracted the most support in the election,
achieving 28 per cent of the vote. But it is unclear whether it
can form a government and the party's deputy leader, Tomislav
Nikolic, says he does not expect to be invited to form the next
government.
Nikolic said he expected the Serbian president, Boris Tadic,
"will not give us the mandate".
"Tadic already said last night that he would not respect the
democratic principle and he would not give a mandate to the
Serbian Radical Party," Nikolic said. He said the pro-Western
parties would have a hard time forming a coalition and forecast
that it would be shortlived and that more elections would be
held before the end of the year.
Western appeals
Solana denied that the vote demonstrated the failure of Western
efforts to quell nationalist feelings in Serbia.
The West told Serbs before the election that they should turn
their backs on nationalism if they hoped to join the EU and
Nato.
But many Serbs appeared to have ignored those appeals.
Tadic, the West's great hope, led his opposition Democratic party
to about 23 per cent of the vote, well behind the Radical party.
The EU froze a stabilisation and association agreement (SAA) with
Belgrade in May over its failure to surrender Ratko Mladic, the
former Bosnian Serb army chief, who was believed to be hiding in
Serbia.
He is wanted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the
Former Yugoslavia for war crimes in the conflict in Bosnia in
the mid-1990s.
Vojislav Seselj, the Radical party's official leader, remains on
trial at the tribunal in the Hague. |
|

Only one woman was fighting against a horde of invaders and
traitors in Malgobek
On
the evening, February, 4th, judicial-medical
examination has established, that the scorched body found in
apartment N17 at home N3 on the street of Oskanov in Маlgobek
(Ingushetia), where February, 3rd, during several
hours there was a fierce fight with application of armoured
technique, belongs to the unknown woman, Ingush informational
sources report.
|
|
|
|
|

Obama says he's 'been
very consistent' on Iraq
ST. LOUIS, Missouri (CNN) -- Sen. Barack Obama, speaking
on board his campaign plane as it headed to St. Louis on
Saturday, continued to defend his position on Iraq --
and questioned reporters' parsing of his words.
"I am surprised at how ... the press ... I'm not trying
to dump on you guys, but I'm surprised at how finely
calibrated every single word was measured," Obama said.
"I wasn't saying anything that I hadn't said before.
That I didn't say a year ago. Or when I was a U.S.
senator. If you look at our position, it's been very
consistent. The notion that we have to get out carefully
has been a consistent position," he said.
"The belief that we have a national security interest in
making sure Iraq is secure, I've been saying
consistently," he added. Noting "the worst-case
scenarios and the parade of horribles that has been
trotted out by [Sen.] John McCain and others about
genocide if we left," he said he has always reserved "the
right to protect people from genocide."
"So a lot of these statements that I've made have been
entirely consistent," Obama added.
Late Saturday afternoon, McCain's campaign responded to
Obama's comments.
In a statement, campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds said, "We
are all absolutely committed to ending this war, but on
Thursday Barack Obama's words indicated that he also
shared John McCain's commitment to securing the peace
beforehand. What's really puzzling is that Barack Obama
still doesn't understand that his words matter."
In North Dakota on Thursday, Obama denied that he's
shying away from his proposed 16-month phased withdrawal
of all combat troops from Iraq, calling it "pure
speculation" and adding that his "position has not
changed."
However, he told reporters questioning his stance that
he will "continue to refine" his policies as warranted.
Watch: Obama clarifies his comments on Iraq »
Presumably unhappy with the media's coverage of his
earlier statements on Iraq -- and after the Republican
National Committee issued attack e-mails asserting he's
"reversed" his position -- Obama called a second news
conference later Thursday to reiterate that he is not
changing his stance.
Obama placed some of the blame for the confusion
Thursday on the McCain camp, arguing they "primed the
pump with the press to suggest that somehow we were
changing our policy when we hadn't."
The McCain campaign responded after the second news
conference with a statement accusing Obama of reversing
his position on Iraq.
"There is nothing wrong with changing your mind when the
facts on the ground dictate it," the statement said. "Indeed,
the facts have changed because of the success of the
surge that John McCain advocated for years and Barack
Obama opposed in a position that put politics ahead of
country."
While he didn't specifically refer to the Iraq flap
later Saturday, Obama touched on how he could be a
better candidate.
"One of the things I've always tried to do is learn from
mistakes and get better, and I think we've run an
awfully good campaign and I think if I hadn't been a
pretty good candidate, I wouldn't be standing here. But
that doesn't mean I can't get better, that my answers
can't be crisper, that I can't be more precise," he said.
In a speech before the African Methodist Episcopal
Church convention in St. Louis, Obama launched a
lighthearted -- and possibly pre-emptive -- strike at
reporters when he talked about government working with
religious organizations.
"Now I've talked about faith-based groups and individual
responsibility for years," he said. "By the way, I just
had to mention for the reporters in the room. I've been
talking about this for a couple years now. Don't think
this is new!"
Also Saturday, an Obama spokeswoman told reporters that
the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and Sen.
Hillary Clinton will appear together at three
fundraisers next week in New York.
Two of the fundraisers on Wednesday night are aimed at
raising money for Obama's Democratic presidential
campaign, and one is to try to retire the debt from
Clinton's failed effort to win the nomination.
On Thursday morning, they appear together at a women's
fundraising breakfast for Obama. All of the events are
private.
"I want to make sure that we're providing Sen. Clinton
with some help just as she is going out of her way to
campaign on our behalf. We're gonna be united," Obama
said Saturday.
Obama has made a push to help the New York senator
retire her campaign's massive debt. He asked top
contributors in June to help Clinton retire her campaign
debt of $22 million, about $12 million of which she
loaned to the campaign.
Obama and his wife, Michelle, both made the maximum
legal donation to Clinton's campaign after it ended.
Winning candidates often work to help retire the debts
of those they defeated once nomination races end.
After the New York events, the two will have appeared
together five times since Clinton ended her quest for
the nomination in June.
Obama announced in June he would not take public funds
for his presidential run, making him the first general
election candidate to do so since public financing was
instituted in the 1970s.
By doing do, he passes up more than $84 million in
public funding, but frees himself from a cap on spending.
Obama has raised more than $270 million. McCain, the
presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has raised
about $100 million as of the end of May and is expected
to take public financing.
McCain was off the campaign trail Saturday, resting with
his family at his home in Sedona, Arizona.
|
|

Accepting the Challenge – is Georgia thinking of war?
As
Russia deployed additional troops to the Abkhazian conflict zone,
Tbilisi has tossed around war rhetoric about Abkhazia. Georgia asserts
that Russia has stationed dozens of armor and artillery systems in the
territory of Abkhazia and posted 200 land troops in Ochamchire.
According to President Mikheil Saakashvili, Georgian authorities have
evidence that Russia tried to provoke the recent uprising in Tbilisi and
use that time to deploy its troops in Abkhazia. "Moscow officials know
that if they separate Abkhazia from Georgia, Georgia will not manage to
exist as an independent state, but we'll respond properly to all such
attacks and protect our country," stated Mikheil Saakasvhili. However,
there are other problems troubling Tbilisi. Soon the UN will discuss the
issue of Kosovo's independence.
The Georgian government fears that if the West recognizes Kosovo's
independence without Russia's approval the latter may recognize
Abkhazia's independence. Archil Gegeshidze, expert at the Foundation of
Strategic Studies and International Relations states, "If Kosovo's
independence is recognized, Russia will certainly try to use this trend
regarding Georgia. However it is impossible to apply Kosovo precedent in
Georgia due to historic, political and other factors."
According to Gegeshidze, Abkhazia's de facto authorities will never
resign and delegate power to the UN. Russia will not allow it. "Due to
these factors, the process which was culminated by Kosovo independence
may not be compared to Georgia. Leave alone the fact that Albanians were
subject to ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, while the violence in Abkhazia
came from Abkhazs and Georgians were the victims of the ethnic cleansing.
There are many other differences in these processes but Russia claims
that if Kosovo's independence is recognized, the same may happen in
Abkhazia," Gegeshidze explained.
‘We'll accept the challenge' Mikheil Saakashvili has responded to the
statement made by his Russian colleague, Vladimer Putin that if Kosovo
gains its independence Abkhazia may also. "We'd like to tell Russians
and others: you cannot divide Georgia. Moreover Georgian state, law
enforcement and security services are mobilized to protect Abkhazia and
Tskhinvali," President Saakashvili declared. Givi Targamadze, chair of
the parliamentary committee for defense and security, states that
recognition of Abkhazia's independence by Russia will be tantamount to
waging war against Georgia. Georgia will accept this challenge.
Nino Burjanadze, Parliament speaker says that the government is willing
to solve the conflict through peaceful, political methods. However, she
added, "The majority of Georgian people except traitors will defend the
unity of Georgia if anyone tries to divide Georgia and recognize
Abkhazia's independence." Is Georgia Ready for War? The statements by
Georgian top officials raise the question whether we will face further
aggravation in the Georgia-Abkhazian conflict zone or resumption of
armed confrontation. If the threat is real, is the Georgian army ready
to fulfill the task and what will the reaction of international
community be?
Will the escalation in Abkhazia spill over in Tskhinvali region? "Russia
wants to declare: Let Abkhazians and Georgians talk but there should not
be any results until a consensus is reached. In this case the talks will
not concern maintenance of Georgia's territorial integrity. Georgia and
Abkhazia will have equal sides during the negotiations similar to the
situation of Kosovo and Serbia. The main goal will be consensus rather
than the territorial integrity of the country," says Gegeshidze. Tornike
Sharashenidze, an expert in international relations, coordinator of GIPA
international policy programs and former director of NATO information
center says that we should not expect any military conflict in the
conflict zone.
This will not happen even if Kosovo's independence is recognized. "Escalation
in Abkhazia is not favorable for Russia, Georgia and international
community. Hence we should not expect such deterioration," he says. Akia
Barbakadze, an independent expert in military issues says, "I doubt that
any military operation is considered a serious state program. However, I
don't exclude that the worst scenarios have been developed in the
general headquarters. Georgia has two frozen conflicts and they may
resolve anytime. As for the armed forces, they must be ready for the
worst plots. A military operation was planned long ago in the conflict
zone and this plan exists in the general headquarter.
The general headquarters' function concerns development of such plans
not only regarding Tskhinvali, Java or Sokhumi. The matter concerns all
possible threats- border violation or attack of would-be enemy. It is
necessary to elaborate such plans." Giorgi Bliadze, independent military
expert believes, "The military headquarters of any normal country
develop such plans notwithstanding the reality of the threat of armed
conflict." But is it reasonable to hold military operation in conflict
zones? Will the operation provide political resolution and ensure
peaceful co-existence for the Georgian, Abkhazian and Ossetian
populations?
According to Giorgi Bliadze, "If any military operation is planned in
the conflict zone it should be short-term and so rapid that Russia must
not have time to react. At the same time the plan should be developed at
the level of political and international relations." "It is necessary to
hold so called blitzkrieg in a contemporary political environment to
assure international community that the problem must be solved in a
military way. Certainly, an information war and the issues of political
resolution should precede the military campaign. The state machine has
not yet developed such preconditions," Giorgi Bliadze explains. Irakli
Sesiashvili, an expert in military security issues, and Director of
Justice and Freedom declares that, "Holding a military operation is
easy.
It is more difficult to calculate the outcome. It must define what
happens after the special operation, what force will oppose the new
authorities and how will the peace be maintained. This process is more
difficult and it requires more human and financial resources than the
operation itself. If Tbilisi holds the special operation in a conflict
zone, Russia will certainly try to aggravate the situation in other
regions." "The reopening of conflict favors Russia's interests. We can
predict that the separatist military units will be equipped with the
Russian arms. However, the conflict will have the character of ethnic
confrontation and it will require Russia's presence in the region.
Russia will also try to beef up peacekeepers' contingent as well as the
action field."
Barbakadze predicts. According to Barbakadze, there is another threat:
the separatists will try to engage peaceful civilians from both sides in
the conflict. This conflict will claim human lives and will compromise
the state's stability and infrastructure. State control may be
temporarily lost in certain territories. How will Georgia's allies react
if the conflict resumes? Barbakadze reckons that the USA will not
support a war, as the crisis will proliferate throughout the Caucasus
region. Unrest in the region does not favor the US national interests.
Assumingly Turkey will refrain from support for the same reason.
The EU will oppose the resumption of any crisis considering the new
neighborhood initiative. Additionally, the crisis in Abkhazia will
escalate tension in Samachablo and certain military resources will be
required in the east. In the case of failure, the process will turn into
an internal political crisis. According to Barbakadze it is impossible
to solve the conflict by peaceful means considering all the factors
involved. Even in the case of a military advantage, the operation will
be held in an unfavorable situation and there will be a minimal chance
of achieving any positive results.
Sesiashvili says, "De facto authorities of Abkhazia have announced that
they will not rest until they regain Kodori gorge. Russian specialists
provide Abkhazians with military training and instructions. The
intelligence service also functions regarding Kodori. All this means
that certain preparations are under way and a large amount of money is
being invested in the process. They are waiting for further political
tension in the country to use that moment in their favor. However,
nowadays, their human resources are poor. The final decision is still up
to the Kremlin. An unstable Georgia favors Russia's interests as this
will hamper the process of Georgia's integration into Euro-Atlantic
structures and damage the country's image."
Source: The Georgian Times
|
U.S. and Turkey Thwart Armenian
Genocide
Bill
With backing from more than half of the House this summer, proponents of
a resolution condemning the Armenian genocide were confident that they
would finally prevail in their quest for Congressional recognition.
Adding to their optimism, Speaker Nancy Pelosi was a longtime backer of
the resolution, which had been pushed mainly by her fellow Californians,
and was committed to bringing it to a House vote. But supporters of the
measure were not prepared for the vehement opposition of two powerful
governments — Turkey, the successor state to the Ottoman Empire, which
historians say conducted the genocide, and the United States, which
needs Turkey’s help in Iraq. Their combined resistance caused the
resolution to falter, embarrassing the speaker on a high-profile foreign
policy front.
On Thursday, supporters surrendered, at least for now, telling Ms.
Pelosi they were willing to wait until next year. “We believe that a
large majority of our colleagues want to support a resolution
recognizing the genocide on the House floor and that they will do so,
provided the timing is more favorable,” the four chief sponsors said in
a letter to Ms. Pelosi.
The faltering of the push to denounce the genocide illustrates what can
happen when domestic politics collide with international affairs and how
treacherous that can be for Congressional leaders like Ms. Pelosi, who
came under criticism this year for a trip to Syria. It also turned a
near triumph into a disappointment for those who believe Congress has a
responsibility to send a message on past inhumanities to prevent future
ones.
“We certainly thought it would be a very tough fight, but it was a much
more lopsided one than we expected,” said Representative Adam B. Schiff,
a California Democrat and a main sponsor of the bill. Once Democrats
gained control of Congress in January, supporters of the measure
mobilized, seeing a way clear to the final vote that had eluded them
because of opposition first from the Clinton administration and then
from the Bush White House.
Ms. Pelosi as well as Representative Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, the new
majority leader, were dedicated proponents of the resolution that would
put the House on record as defining the deaths of an estimated 1.5
million Armenians in 1915 as genocide. The crisis in Darfur, in Sudan,
had raised public consciousness about genocide as well.
“This issue had a constituency, and there was a lot of momentum due to
the switch in leadership and Darfur,” said Aram Hamparian, executive
director of the Armenian National Committee of America.
It did not hurt that Armenians are an influential bloc in California, Ms.
Pelosi’s home, and that the resolution was a top priority of California
House members of both parties, including Mr. Schiff and two other
Democrats, Brad Sherman and Anna G. Eshoo. Ms. Eshoo is a lawmaker of
Armenian heritage who is a close friend of Ms. Pelosi’s.
Mr. Sherman said the speaker’s decision to pledge a vote by the full
House was not about personal relationships but about principle. “You
don’t have to have a special relationship with this speaker to get her
to be in favor of recognizing genocide,” he said.
While the backers of the resolution pressed ahead, the Turkish
government also went to work, hiring a lobbying team to raise concerns
about the potential backlash in Turkey if the resolution was approved,
particularly when Turkey is a staging ground for the Iraq war.
The Turkish government has resisted the characterization of a genocide,
seeing the deaths as among the many tragic losses in a time of brutal
conflict. But most of the lobbying against the resolution centered on
the need not to antagonize Turkey at a time when it was of crucial
strategic value.
Among those carrying that message was Representative John P. Murtha, a
Pennsylvania Democrat and a close ally of Ms. Pelosi’s, who began
warning her in February against the bill.
“I explained what the ramifications were from a military standpoint, but
she said she felt compelled to do it,” said Mr. Murtha, who welcomed
Thursday’s decision. By midsummer, the advocates had 225 sponsors, more
than the minimum of 218 needed to assure passage. But they refrained
from pushing for a vote because Turkey was having its own national
elections. Instead, they aimed for the fall.
Encouraged to consider the bill, the Foreign Affairs Committee approved
it on Oct. 10, but by a relatively narrow 27-to-21 vote, because
lawmakers were well aware that the measure could reach the floor this
year.
Mr. Bush and the Turkish government intensified their opposition and
within days, co-sponsors of both parties began abandoning the
resolution.
Ms. Pelosi said it was the responsibility of its backers to secure the
needed votes. “This is the legislative process,” she told reporters last
week when asked about the furor. Its backers began reassessing their
strategy and one result was the letter to the speaker on Thursday.
Even some of Ms. Pelosi’s allies said the bill’s withdrawal, while an
embarrassment, may well have averted a larger problem for her had the
proposal been approved, setting off problems with Turkey. Advocates of
the bill predicted that Congress would eventually regret backing off in
the face of a threatened backlash from an ally. “This sets a terrible
example,” Mr. Hamparian said.
|
|
Iraq's
government Tuesday repeated a pledge to shut down offices of the Kurdish
rebel movement that has triggered a border crisis with Turkey, but
Turkey's prime minister said his government "cannot wait forever" for
results. Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki said Tuesday that Iraqi
authorities will shutter the offices of the Kurdistan Worker's Party, or
PKK, in northern Iraq's Kurdish territories.
The group has battled for autonomy for Kurds in
southeastern Turkey for more than two decades, and Turkish authorities
blame the group for the deaths of dozens of soldiers and civilians in
recent weeks.
Tens of thousands of Turkish troops are massing along
Iraq's northern frontier. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told
reporters during a visit to London on Tuesday that cross-border raids
targeting the PKK could be launched "at any time."
The group has been designated a terrorist organization by
the United States and the European Union, and al-Maliki used the same
term to describe it Tuesday. He said Iraq would not allow its territory
to be used as a "launch pad" for attacks on Turkey.
"The government will do its best in order to limit the
PKK and its terrorist activities that are a threat to Iraq just like it
is a threat to Turkey," al-Maliki said.
|
|
|
|

Levan Gachechiladze: 'I will
not stop until you kill me!'
Georgia's leader Mikheil Saakashvili has won re-election,
official results showed Wednesday, sealing a bitterly fought
victory that his main challenger is refusing to accept. Results
based on 98.8 percent of ballots counted showed Saakashvili
ahead with 52.21 percent, meaning he could not fall below the 50
percent barrier for winning in a single round, the Central
Election Commission website showed. His nearest rival in
Saturday's snap poll was wine entrepreneur Levan Gachechiladze,
with 25.26 percent.
With 1.2 percent of ballots left to count, the precise results
for each candidate could still shift slightly, but not by enough
to change Saakashvili's victory.
Saakashvili, 40, now has a new five-year mandate to pursue
radical reforms to transform US-backed Georgia's economy and
push for NATO and EU membership.
He told a late-night talk show Tuesday that the election had "demonstrated
the will of the Georgian people" and he reached out to his
opponents.
"No one can ignore the opinion of people who did not vote for
us," he said. "We have to find consensus with the opposition."
However, the opposition on Tuesday refused to recognise the
result, claiming Saakashvili cheated to avoid a second round and
threatening a mass protest Sunday if the authorities did not
agree to a run-off.
The opposition's confrontational tone raised fears of a repeat
of the violent unrest in November which triggered the January 5
election.
Gachechiladze, 43, swore to fight the official results to the
end, saying in an angry television appearance: "I will not stop
until you kill me!"
Despite being re-elected, the fact that Saakashvili barely
avoided a run-off was a powerful rebuke for someone who four
years ago first took the presidency with 96 percent.
A flamboyant politician who speaks five languages, Saakashvili
has won plaudits for pulling Georgia out of years of economic
chaos and instability since the peaceful Rose Revolution.
However opponents accuse him of authoritarian tendencies and
forgetting the poor left behind in free-market reforms.
The snap election, held a year early, got important backing from
foreign observers of the Organisation for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
However, there was also criticism in the West -- a sign that
Saakashvili's image has yet to recover from the November crisis,
when police clubbed demonstrators and the main opposition
television station was closed.
The opposition appeared to be digging in its heels.
Tempers flared as final votes were counted, with Gachechiladze
demanding the resignation of election commission head Levan
Tarkhnishvili.
"You are telling lies to the whole of Georgia," he shouted,
jabbing his finger at Tarkhnishvili after barging into his
office.
Justice Minister Ekaterine Tkeshelashvili attacked what she
called "attempts to threaten the work of the Central Election
Commission" and said the opposition must "respect the Georgian
people and its choice."
There were seven candidates, including Georgia's richest man,
Badri Patarkatsishvili, whom the government accuses of plotting
a coup from his London home.
Georgia has a population of only five million and is largely
mountainous, famous for its wine, ancient churches, and male
choirs.
Until recently the country was closely linked to Russia, but is
now largely cut off from its former imperial and Soviet-era
master.
Angered by Georgia's overtures to the West and efforts to join
NATO, Moscow has imposed sweeping economic sanctions and
supports armed rebels controlling two separatist regions --
Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
Georgia is of growing strategic importance at the crossroads of
Central Asia and Europe, as well as Russia, Iran and NATO member
Turkey.
Major US-backed oil and gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea to
the Mediterranean run through the country.
Georgia also contributes 2,000 troops to the US-led war in Iraq
and is about to send others to Afghanistan. Source: Agencies |
|

Iraq to Tackle Kirkuk Crisis
Arabs
in Iraqi province of Kirkuk have presented a new plan for
tackling crisis on destiny of the city.
The
coordinator of the so-called Iraqi Republican Gathering Ahmed
Al-Obeidi told Alalam Friday, "We have presented a plan based on
which Kirkuk would enjoy special administrative establishment
and ethnic elements will have a share in its management."
He said the
plan has been presented to get rid of other projects, including
annexation or establishment of an independent zone. "The plan
calls for division of power and joint management and remaining
in the administrative border of the province for a period of
transition," he announced.
The plan will be announced one month prior to the referendum on
destiny of Kirkuk and it would make it clear whether the city
will continue to be affiliated to the central government, or
join Kurdistan region or turn into an autonomous region.
Al-Obeidi stressed that the plan will be adopted in agreement
with other political groups in the city.
Meanwhile, Turkmen member of Kirkuk governorate Ali Mahdi told
Alalam that as a region, Kirkuk should not be dependent on
central government or any other state.
"We Turkmen movements and parties are in full consensus on the
issue that Kirkuk should be regarded as a special zone."
Yahoo News |

Kavkaz
Center/After a series of successful
military and sabotage operations by Ingush sector of Caucasus
Front (Commander Amir Magas), the occupation forces have started
a large scale "cleansing" of Ingushetia. Senior officials from
Moscow arrived to the republic. According to latest reports, the
ringleader of "Interior Ministry of Russia" Rashid Nurgaliyev,
ordered to
"cleanse" the
Ingushetia by any means. One of the Russian ringleaders named
Edelev, who is also proclaimed to be the deputy of Nurgaliyev,
met with formation of Russians invaders and Ingush national
traitors. The ringleader admitted that the occasion for a
massive punitive "cleansing" have been "recent developments" in
Ingushetia. Let's recall that the most successful military
operation of Ingush Mujahideen was attack on the base of the
occupants in the village of Troitskaya, when dozens of occupants
and national traitors had been killed and injured during a night
battle.
The attack was a major blow to the command of occupants and
local traitors. Confusion and panic prevailed among the leaders
of the invaders and their stooges, reflected in the designation
of large losses, which were then immediately disavowed by the
order from Moscow and the instructions to all media to stop
giving information on developments in the village. The same
thing occurred after the attack on Ingush leader's convoy that
the Mujahideen conducted in the city of Magas, a fortified
citadel of Putin gangs. The occupants and national traitors have
hidden the information about this attack. In spite of the start
of the punitive "cleansings", Ingush Mujahideen have attacked
occupants again. The Mujahideen attacked so-called "location of
a regiment of Interior Ministry Troops of Russia", which is in
located Nazran, at night of July 26. This was reported by the
occupants. Fire came from the cemetery. The attack started about
2:30 p.m. local time. As always, the occupants do not disclose
their losses, saying some facilities have been damaged. The
sweep operations were necessary "to uproot bandits roaming the
region who came from Chechnya, a ringleader Edelev said trying
to disavow successes of Mujahideen. However, the realities of
Chechnya force to think otherwise. These days the whole republic
flooded with rumours about a possible attack of Mujahideen on
capital Jokhar. The attack is supposed to take place in August.
Such rumours are often spread by Chechen national traitors.
Relatives of Kadyrovians tell that a gloom prevails among the
traitors. Kadyrov's police stated they would not resist the
Mujahideen if they attacked the city. Those who are still in
Kadyrov's gangs, admit that it is senseless to confront the
Mujahideen who consciously seek the death, unlike traitors who
seek to survive (this is the reason why they have gone to serve
the kafirs). Let's point out in this regard that there is no
information from the Chechen command on possible storming of
capital Jokhar. We only know that the armed forces of CRI took
control over large areas of mountainous Chechnya during last 4-5
months. Stationary check points are set in many areas and near
settlements, but mobile roadblocks operate in flat areas as well
as near capital Jokhar.
Sabotage squads of Mujahideen again activate their presence in
the capital in recent weeks. Young people in masses go to the
mountains to join the Mujahideen. At the same time bloody
confrontation among national traitors take place. Several dozens
of Kadyrovians have escaped to the mountains recently. Those who
do not dare go to the mountains, leave the country together with
their families. And it continues to grow. As for Kadyrov, he
continues bacchanal lies and impudence. One of the most
discussed news in today's Chechnya is the construction of a
brothel for dozens of Kadyrov's concubines from local girls, for
whom Kadyrov sets up so-called "Barsky house" in the city
centre. This pre-revolutionary building once belonged to a
Russian judge, but a party-economical elite had lived there in
Soviet times. Today, Kadyrov adapted it for his concubines. |
|

Officials: Gunman
dead after bloody campus rampage
NEW: Virginia attorney general says 32 dead, including gunman
• Four hospitals report 29 wounded
• Attacks mark deadliest school shooting in U.S. history
• Student describes situation as "mayhem"; says 2 students
jumped from window
A lone gunman is dead after officials said he killed at least 31
people Monday during shootings in a dorm and a building housing
classrooms at Virginia Tech, making it the deadliest school
attack in U.S. history.
Officials said the shooting incidents occurred two hours apart.
Attorney General Bob McDonnell confirmed the death toll and
said, "That's the best information that I've got from the law
enforcement officers who are on the scene."
It was not clear if the gunman was killed by police or if he
took his own life.
"Some victims were shot in a classroom," university police Chief
Wendell Flinchum said. Spokespersons for hospitals in Roanoke,
Christiansburg, Blacksburg and Salem told CNN they were treating
29 people from the shootings.
Sharon Honaker with Carilion New River Medical Center in
Christiansburg said one of the four gunshot victims being
treated there was in critical condition.
Scott Hill, a spokesman for Montgomery Regional Hospital in
Blacksburg, where 17 wounded students were taken, said he wasn't
expecting any more victims.
"Today the university was struck with a tragedy that we consider
of monumental proportions," said university President Charles
Steger. "The university is shocked and indeed horrifiedThe
killings mark the deadliest school shooting in U.S. history,
surpassing attacks at Columbine High School in 1999 and at the
University of Texas in 1966.
One person was killed and others were wounded at multiple
locations inside a dormitory about 7:15 a.m., Flinchum said. Two
hours later, another shooting at Norris Hall -- the engineering
science and mechanics building -- resulted in multiple
casualties, the university reportedThe first reported shooting
occurred at West Ambler Johnston Hall, a coed dormitory that
houses 895 students. The dormitory, one of the largest residence
halls on the 2,600-acre campus, is located near the drill field
and stadium.
Amie Steele, editor-in-chief of the campus newspaper, said one
of her reporters at the dormitory reported "mass chaos."
The reporter said there were "lots of students running around,
going crazy, and the police officers were trying to settle
everyone down and keep everything under control," according to
Kristyn Heiser said she was in class about 9:30 a.m. when she
and her classmates saw about six gun-wielding police officers
run by a window.
"We were like, 'What's going on?' Because this definitely is a
quaint town where stuff doesn't really happen. It's pretty
boring here," said Heiser during a phone interview as she sat on
her classroom floor.
Another student, Tiffany Otey, said she and her classmates
initially thought the gunshots were construction noise until
they heard screaming and police officers with bulletproof vests
and machine guns entered her classroom.
"They were telling us to put our hands above our head and if we
didn't cooperate and put our hands above our heads they would
shoot," Otey said. "I guess they were afraid, like us, like the
shooter was going to be among one of us."
Student reports 'mayhem'
Student Matt Waldron said he did not hear the gunshots because
he was listening to music, but he heard police sirens and saw
officers hiding behind trees with their guns drawn.
"They told us to get out of there so we ran across the drill
field as quick as we could," he said.
|
|
|
|